Skip to main content

Table 2 Perceptions related to integration of nutrigenomics - survey

From: Exploring the future of nutrigenomics: dietitians’ perceptions on integration in Indian practice

 

Integrator

n (%)

Non-integrator

n (%)

p-value

Pre-existing nutrigenomics awareness

   

Have you or Would you consider getting a genetic test for yourself? (n = 249)

0.639

Yes

61 (75.3)

125 (74.4)

 

No

3 (3.7)

11 (6.5)

Maybe

17 (21)

32 (19)

Have you heard of the term ‘Nutrigenomics’ before? (n = 249)

-

Yes

79 (97.5)

163 (97)

 

No

2 (2.5)

5 (3)

Was Nutrigenomics taught as a part of your qualification? (n = 249)

0.359

Yes

46 (56.8)

85 (50.6)

 

No

35 (43.2)

83 (49.4)

Provided counselling to clients/patients related to nutrigenomics in the past year? (n = 249)

 

0.151

Yes

32 (39.5)

51 (30.4)

 

No

49 (60.5)

117 (69.6)

Read scientific literature related to nutrigenomics in the past year. (n = 249)

0.191

Yes

57 (70.4)

131 (78)

 

No

24 (29.6)

37 (22)

Interested in learning more about Nutrigenomics (n = 249)

  

0.094

Yes

75 (92.6)

143 (85.1)

 

Maybe

6 (7.4)

25 (14.9)

How important do you think genetic testing is in the medical/health industry? (n = 249)

-

Not important

0 (0)

2 (1.2)

 

Important

81 (100)

166 (98.8)

How equipped are dietitians/nutritionists to provide nutrigenomics counselling? (n = 249)

0.959

Not equipped

38 (46.9)

78 (46.4)

 

Neutral

37 (45.7)

79 (47)

Equipped

6 (7.4)

11 (6.5)

Likeliness to change aspects of your practice due to new knowledge regarding nutrigenomics? (n = 249)

0.153

Likely

43 (53.1)

73 (43.5)

 

Not likely

38 (46.9)

95 (56.5)

Perceived Benefits of Application of Nutrigenomics

Greater individualization of diet prescription (personal nutrition.) (n = 249)

0.410

Disagree

3 (3.7)

4 (2.4)

 

Neutral

6 (7.4)

21 (12.5)

 

Agree

72 (88.9)

143 (85.1)

 

Stronger foundations for nutrition. (n = 249)

0.013 a

Disagree

1 (1.2)

3 (1.8)

 

Neutral

18 (22.2)

15 (8.9)

 

Agree

62 (76.5)

150 (89.3)

 

Dietary prescriptions that would effectively manage or prevent certain diseases. (n = 249)

0.064

Disagree

8 (9.9)

6 (3.6)

 

Neutral

25 (30.9)

43 (25.6)

 

Agree

48 (59.3)

119 (70.8)

 

Perceived Consumer Motivators Affecting the Implementation of Nutrigenomics

Motivated by desire to prevent or manage disease. (n = 249)

0.011 a

Disagree

9 (11.1)

5 (3.0)

 

Neutral

23 (28.4)

37 (22)

 

Agree

49 (60.5)

126 (75)

 

Prevent a disease based on family history. (n = 249)

0.005 a

Disagree

4 (4.9)

0 (0)

 

Neutral

17 (21)

24 (14.3)

 

Agree

60 (74.1)

144 (85.7)

 

Control health outcomes based on family history. (n = 249)

  

0.054

Disagree

5 (6.2)

6 (3.6)

 

Neutral

29 (35.8)

39 (23.2)

 

Agree

47 (58)

123 (73.2)

 

Improve overall health-related quality of life. (n = 249)

  

0.266

Disagree

4 (4.9)

3 (1.8)

 

Neutral

18 (22.2)

31 (18.5)

 

Agree

59 (72.8)

134 (79.8)

 

Perceived Barriers Affecting the Implementation of Nutrigenomics

   

Cost concerns. (n = 249)

  

0.000 a

Disagree

15 (18.5)

13 (7.7)

 

Neutral

33 (40.7)

41 (24.4)

 

Agree

33 (40.7)

114 (67.9)

 

Not enough experts to convey professional expertise. (n = 249)

  

0.000 a

Disagree

8 (9.9)

1 (0.6)

 

Neutral

19 (23.5)

22 (13.1)

 

Agree

54 (66.7)

145 (86.3)

 

Lack of Continuing Education for Healthcare Professionals. (n = 249)

  

0.003 a

Disagree

10 (12.3)

14 (8.3)

 

Neutral

29 (35.8)

31 (18.5)

 

Agree

42 (51.9)

123 (73.2)

 

Lack of Continuing Education for Consumers. (n = 249)

  

0.003 a

Disagree

6 (7.4)

3 (1.8)

 

Neutral

25 (30.9)

30 (17.9)

 

Agree

50 (61.7)

135 (80.4)

 

Limited access to Nutrigenomics for clients or patients. (n = 249)

  

0.000 a

Disagree

6 (7.4)

5 (3)

 

Neutral

24 (29.6)

20 (11.9)

 

Agree

51 (63)

143 (85.1)

 

Confidentiality issues. (n = 249)

  

0.002 a

Disagree

9 (11.1)

17 (10.1)

 

Neutral

27 (33.3)

24 (14.3)

 

Agree

45 (55.6)

127 (75.6)

 

Moral concerns (n = 249)

  

0.044 a

Disagree

9 (11.1)

17 (10.1)

 

Neutral

26 (32.1)

31 (18.5)

 

Agree

46 (56.8)

120 (71.4)

 

Too many environmental influences to give a definite connection between the effect of nutrition on disease progression. (n = 249)

0.034 a

Disagree

4 (4.9)

9 (5.4)

 

Neutral

31 (38.3)

38 (22.6)

 

Agree

46 (56.8)

121 (72)

 

Lack of clinical trials to prove efficacy of personalized interventions. (n = 249)

0.013 a

Disagree

7 (8.6)

4 (2.4)

 

Neutral

27 (33.3)

40 (23.8)

 

Agree

47 (58)

124 (73.8)

 
  1. ap value using χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate, p < 0.05 considered statistically significant